Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Inflation

Year X
2017
Subject X
Employers' liability

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Employers' liability (9)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Henley
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 cc192-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving this Motion I will speak also to the draft Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers’ Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2017. I am required to confirm to the Committee that these provisions are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, and I am happy so to do.

The...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 cc192-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interfere again but when I read this I got a nasty jangle in the back of my head which said that this does not necessarily fit with what we discussed before, in the days when my noble friend Lord Freud was bringing the Bill...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 cc194-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Henley, for his introduction and explanation of the regulations. I am sorry that the noble Lord, Lord James, has had a nasty jangle in the back of his head. Clearly, he is concerned about undertakings made in respect of the Royal British...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 c195GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will put the noble Lord’s assertion to the test with one simple question: can we say with absolute certainty that not one penny from the Royal British Legion has been withheld or interfered with by us through the conflict between its initiatives and ours, and that everybody...

Member
Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 c195GC
House
House of Lords

No, I cannot possibly say that. It is not my role as a shadow Minister. If anybody is going to give those undertakings, it is the noble Lord, Lord Henley, and I wish him well.

As we have heard, the regulations cover various compensation schemes, including the ones for pneumoconiosis and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 cc195-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, and my noble friend Lord James of Blackheath for their comments. The noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, asked a number of fairly detailed questions, a great many of which will, I suspect, be far better dealt with in correspondence, if the noble...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 cc197-8GC
House
House of Lords

If the Minister will allow me to intervene, it is not just a question of looking at the total numbers of people who are new sufferers, particularly in relation to mesothelioma; it is the extent to which they are able to access compensation—as the Minister put it—speedily, whether it is...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 c198GC
House
House of Lords

I want to make sure I get it right and give the right figure. The noble Lord is asking whether we are reaching all those who we think are affected. I think I can give an assurance that 100% of those who are suffering from the five diseases that I...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 c199GC
House
House of Lords