Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,115 results for subject:"Transitional arrangements"

Year X
2016

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is no doubt timely to review the valuation of properties for the purposes of business rates. My recollection is that it is now 25 years since the valuation for council tax purposes was applied. Consequently, we still have the same number of bands and the same financial...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2016
Reference
777 c1687
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the context of the existing system, the proposal that the Minister and the department have come up with is the right response. The amended version of option 2, which the documentation explains, is probably the right thing to introduce.

However, there is a lot of concern about the...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2016
Reference
777 c1687
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have heard, these regulations bring into effect a transitional scheme to phase increases and reductions on non-domestic rates following a revaluation. The scheme has been in

place before and it applies only to England, as these matters are devolved in the other parts of the United...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2016
Reference
777 cc1687-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have participated in this debate on the non-domestic rating regulations very much. I will endeavour to deal with the points that they have raised.

First, on the point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Beecham—and indeed by the noble Lords, Lord Shipley and Lord...

Member
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2016
Reference
777 cc1688-9
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question

Lead member
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth
Answering member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
21 December 2016
Reference
777 cc1685-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these regulations provide the mechanism to introduce the transitional relief scheme for the business rates revaluation that takes effect in April 2017. This will help almost 600,000 businesses with £3.6 billion of relief over the next five years.

Business rates are a property tax where the amount paid depends...

Member
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 December 2016
Reference
777 cc1685-7
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, whether it is his policy to negotiate a transitional agreement with the EU so that existing trading arrangements for UK companies will be able to continue beyond 1 April 2019; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2016
Reference
57205
House
House of Commons

Implementation of the 1995 and 2011 Pension Acts

The petition of residents of Erewash,

Declares that as a result of the way in which the 1995 Pension Act and the 2011 Pension Act were implemented, women born in the 1950s (on or after 6 April 1951) have unfairly borne the burden of...

Type
Paper petitions
Date
16 December 2016
Reference
618 c19P
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, what assessment the Government has made of the transitional support that would be required for exporting companies based in the UK for a future outside the (a) Single Market and (b) customs union.

Asked by
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2016
Reference
56638
House
House of Commons

Implementation of the 1995 and 2011 Pension Acts

The petition of residents of Erewash,

Declares that as a result of the way in which the 1995 Pension Act and the 2011 Pension Act were implemented, women born in the 1950s (on or after 6 April 1951) have unfairly borne the burden of...

Type
Paper petitions
Notes
Petition presented to the House but not read on the Floor.
Date
14 December 2016
Reference
618 cc9-12P
House
House of Commons

Implementation of the 1995 and 2011 Pension Acts

The petition of residents of Caerphilly County Borough,

Declares that as a result of the way in which the 1995 Pension Act and the 2011 Pension Act were implemented, women born in the 1950s (on or after 6 April 1951) have unfairly borne the...

Lead member
Damian Green
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Observations on petitions
Date
14 December 2016
Reference
618 cc10-2P
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Marcus Jones
Answering member
Teresa Pearce
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
12 December 2016
House
House of Commons

Implementation of the 1995 and 2011 Pension Acts

The petition of residents of North East Fife,

Declares that as a result of the way in which the 1995 Pension Act and the 2011 Pension Act were implemented, women born in the 1950s (on or after 6 April 1951) have unfairly borne the...

Lead member
Stephen Gethins
Type
Paper petitions
Notes
Petition presented to the House but not read on the Floor.
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 cc3-6P
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions is fully aware of the issue, which we debated in this Chamber just last week. He has clearly stated that the introduction of further transitional arrangements cannot be justified given the imperative need to focus public resources on helping those in most need. There are no plans to go beyond the £1.1 billion concession introduced when Parliament considered the changes.

Answered by
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c361
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that response, disappointingly predictable as it was. Will she tell me whether anyone in Government at all has done an analysis of how much it would cost to implement transitional measures in comparison with what it will cost the Government reputationally and financially when the Women Against State Pension Inequality take them to court and win?

Asked by
Emma Lewell (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c361
House
House of Commons

Consistent is how I would prefer to describe my answer. The Government have looked into a variety of different proposals that have come forward in many forms, both from the WASPI campaign and from Opposition parties. As I have very clearly stated, we will not make any further transitional arrangements.

Answered by
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c361
House
House of Commons

The Minister must know that the lack of transitional support is causing real hardship to women in her constituency, as it is in mine. In the interests of transparency, will she publish any proposals that have come up since the Pensions Act 2011? Will she publish them and the Government’s research, so we can see what they have done?

Asked by
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c362
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman will know, the welfare system provides a safety net for those experiencing hardship. We have made it very clear that we have already provided £1.1 billion in transitional concessions. The Government have published a great deal of figures on this subject. It is very difficult for the Government to publish further statistics on proposals that have come forward from both the WASPI campaign and Opposition parties when it is very unclear what provisions would be included around those transitional arrangements for women as well as men.

Answered by
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c362
House
House of Commons

With the effects of austerity being felt disproportionately by women, another Government policy affecting women is the 4% tax on child maintenance. Does the Minister accept that this places an additional tax on survivors of domestic violence, and will she ensure that that is addressed?

Asked by
Angela Crawley (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c362
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for that question, although I am not sure how it relates to the WASPI campaign. As she will know, I answered questions on this very subject at the Select Committee yesterday. Interestingly, no mention was made about the charges to parents in the collect and pay system. We are determined to encourage as many families as possible to have family-based arrangements. Indeed, even in cases where there has been domestic violence, the child maintenance service can step in to make sure that bank details can be passed safely, including using bank accounts that do not have a geographic location—they have a centralised sort code—so that we protect women and have as few families as possible within the collect and pay arrangements.

Answered by
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 December 2016
Reference
618 c362
House
House of Commons