Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:Taxation

Year X
2014
Member X
Sheila Gilmore

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More
Gilmore, Sheila (29)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Before the Chancellor of the Exchequer tells me the unemployment figures in my constituency, I of course welcome the fact that the claimant count is down—but that is not necessarily the same as unemployment, as the right hon. Gentleman knows. We are now getting closer to the point where we...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 December 2014
Reference
589 c344
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend concerned that, given the speed of these changes, some of the other longer-term reforms such as auto-enrolment may be impacted on? Is she worried that these issues might not have been properly looked at?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2014
Reference
587 c330
House
House of Commons

Does not that illustrate the need for gathering and publishing the information, as proposed by our new clause 9? We are constantly hearing new things, such as, “There will be more costs for guidance, but we don’t know what they are or what will happen.” If the information is going...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2014
Reference
583 c918
House
House of Commons

I am sure that my hon. Friend, like me, welcomes the Government’s conversion and the way in which they have changed their policy. However, it is reasonable for us to question why the original decision was taken.

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2014
Reference
583 c934
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that it seems odd to suggest that the chopping and changing was due to a sudden discovery that the economy was improving? The decision, in effect, to reintroduce the allowance was taken in 2012, when growth was extremely low. It would appear from these plans...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2014
Reference
583 c938
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend want to reflect on the suggestion made earlier that it did not really matter to people whether the investment allowance was clear? Surely, when putting forward a formal business plan, people are not necessarily just working on a year-to-year basis; they want to know what, if...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2014
Reference
583 c955
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will have attended previous debates on this issue. Indeed, only yesterday in the Chamber, lectures were being given by Government Members about the need to simplify the tax code. Does she not find surprising the support for measures such as the one that we are debating today?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 April 2014
Reference
579 c281
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 April 2014
Reference
579 c286
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman consider the involvement of other variables? For example, those who are married are likely to be together for longer than those who are not and who split up, and the length of the relationship is likely to contribute to the stability of the children and their...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 April 2014
Reference
579 c287
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 April 2014
Reference
579 c288
House
House of Commons

For many poorer couples who are living together, whether they are married or not, the benefits system does indeed have a couples penalty. Would the hon. Gentleman be interested in campaigning to end that?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 April 2014
Reference
579 c314
House
House of Commons

We hear so much in this House about how little money there is and how hard it is, yet certain members of the Government support this measure. It appears that not all do—the Lib Dem part of the coalition may or may not support it; it said it did not...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 April 2014
Reference
579 cc316-7
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman explain where, following the rate change, this money has suddenly come from if it is not re-phased income? Is he suggesting that people have somehow avoided tax or that people have suddenly come into this country to pay it? He must have some reason for...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c152
House
House of Commons

For those who have already made the decision that they want to reduce corporation tax in this way, it is easy to characterise the debate as one group of businesses being pitted against another. The debate has to be taken in context. On the basis of that argument, it would...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c163
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the hon. Gentleman is interested in business rates, the subject we are discussing. Our suggestion is that in order to make a real difference to those businesses, we can go far further in the way we deal with business rates.

Rather dramatic statements are made that a...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c164
House
House of Commons

We must review constantly what we do to get it right. The suggestion is that a review in itself causes uncertainty, but there are many uncertainties in business. The constant discussion about the EU, Britain’s place in it and whether there should or should not be a referendum is an...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c164
House
House of Commons

We still see high levels of remuneration and bonuses at banks while small businesses are told that there is no money to lend. Sometimes, of course, we are told the opposite is the case: banks allege that it is not a lack of money, but that businesses are not coming...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c164
House
House of Commons

Value added tax has been a difficulty for a lot of individuals and for small businesses. The amendment is an opportunity for us to review these matters. If Conservative Members are right that such a change would be harmful, a review would show that. It has to be demonstrated to...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c165
House
House of Commons

I do not think that the Minister has yet addressed the lack of balance in the growth that is being shown, and the concern that has been expressed about that by the IMF and others. If policies such as the reduction in corporation tax were intended to boost manufacturing and...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 c167
House
House of Commons

We touched on this issue in the earlier debate. The right hon. Member for Wokingham (Mr Redwood), who is no longer in his place, told me that I probably did not mix with many very rich people, which I suspect is probably true. My whole life and the constituency I...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
579 cc182-4
House
House of Commons