1-20 of 194 results for subject:Pollution
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.248 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.011 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Pollution
- We searched for
- subject_t:Pollution OR subject_ses:92505
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
I am grateful to you, Mr Speaker, for agreeing to this debate, but I regret having to come back to the House and subject it to a fourth debate in less than three years about a single issue in one constituency—radiation contamination in the Dalgety Bay area of Fife.
It is...
I am grateful to you, Mr Speaker, for agreeing to this debate, but I regret having to come back to the House and subject it to a fourth debate in less than three years about a single issue in one constituency—radiation contamination in the Dalgety Bay area of Fife.
It is...
I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for securing this important debate. Does he agree that there is no way in which my constituents in Rosyth or his in Dalgety Bay will accept for a second that waste being stored at the site or in the wider West Fife...
I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for securing this important debate. Does he agree that there is no way in which my constituents in Rosyth or his in Dalgety Bay will accept for a second that waste being stored at the site or in the wider West Fife...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. It seems that one part of the Ministry of Defence has no clue what another part is doing. It wants to store waste at one place in that part of Fife but refuses to clean up the mess left by previous waste in another...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. It seems that one part of the Ministry of Defence has no clue what another part is doing. It wants to store waste at one place in that part of Fife but refuses to clean up the mess left by previous waste in another...
I congratulate the right hon. Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr Brown) on securing this debate—his fourth on the subject since November 2011. Believe me, Mr Speaker, I sincerely hope that he will not have cause to call a further debate, and that some of the things I say today...
I congratulate the right hon. Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr Brown) on securing this debate—his fourth on the subject since November 2011. Believe me, Mr Speaker, I sincerely hope that he will not have cause to call a further debate, and that some of the things I say today...
I think the Minister knows—and no one should be under any other impression—that it was only in 2010 and 2011 that the scale of the particles appearing on the surface became so great that we had to have the extra investigations, to find out what needed to be done. The...
I think the Minister knows—and no one should be under any other impression—that it was only in 2010 and 2011 that the scale of the particles appearing on the surface became so great that we had to have the extra investigations, to find out what needed to be done. The...
I have given the right hon. Gentleman an assurance that I want to see this sorted out quickly. There are two bits of material that are necessary in order to do it properly. One is the options appraisal
study to which I have referred. It is currently in draft form...
I have given the right hon. Gentleman an assurance that I want to see this sorted out quickly. There are two bits of material that are necessary in order to do it properly. One is the options appraisal
study to which I have referred. It is currently in draft form...
rose—
rose—
Before the right hon. Gentleman intervenes again, may I just comment on the objects that were found and the influence they had on the assessment of risk? As I said, the risk was determined at one in a million. That went down to one in 10 million. It was the...
Before the right hon. Gentleman intervenes again, may I just comment on the objects that were found and the influence they had on the assessment of risk? As I said, the risk was determined at one in a million. That went down to one in 10 million. It was the...
I accept what the Minister says, but the health protection organisation that advises him has said that this work has to be done. I repeat: the clean-up will have to happen. It is right that the engineering options are investigated in detail so we can target where the remedial work...
I accept what the Minister says, but the health protection organisation that advises him has said that this work has to be done. I repeat: the clean-up will have to happen. It is right that the engineering options are investigated in detail so we can target where the remedial work...
Yes, of course, but it is not a decision to be taken unilaterally by the MOD; SEPA will wish to take a view and it has a copy of the draft paper already. It will want to make a determination, it has said, once it is in possession of the...
Yes, of course, but it is not a decision to be taken unilaterally by the MOD; SEPA will wish to take a view and it has a copy of the draft paper already. It will want to make a determination, it has said, once it is in possession of the...
Does the Minister accept that the MOD cannot abdicate its responsibility in this area?
Does the Minister accept that the MOD cannot abdicate its responsibility in this area?
The MOD has consistently made clear that as the default position it will accept its legal responsibilities, but that it wants to go beyond that and make sure—without the intervention of expensive lawyers who will wrap us up for years—that we take action by negotiation with all interested parties so...
The MOD has consistently made clear that as the default position it will accept its legal responsibilities, but that it wants to go beyond that and make sure—without the intervention of expensive lawyers who will wrap us up for years—that we take action by negotiation with all interested parties so...
Further to the point that my right hon. Friend the Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr Brown) and I have made to the Minister about submarines, will he take the opportunity to give real cast-iron guarantees to my constituents and those of my right hon. Friend that there will be...
Further to the point that my right hon. Friend the Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr Brown) and I have made to the Minister about submarines, will he take the opportunity to give real cast-iron guarantees to my constituents and those of my right hon. Friend that there will be...
The hon. Gentleman is talking about the submarine dismantling project and will be aware that there are seven hulls currently at Rosyth awaiting dismantling. Their cores have been removed; he knows that. The pressurised vessels that contain those cores remain and because of the exposure to radiation over the years...
The hon. Gentleman is talking about the submarine dismantling project and will be aware that there are seven hulls currently at Rosyth awaiting dismantling. Their cores have been removed; he knows that. The pressurised vessels that contain those cores remain and because of the exposure to radiation over the years...
Agree to on question.
Agree to on question.
That this House notes that residents who live in close proximity to meat rendering and other processing plants such as waste and recycling plants are frequently subject to appalling odours making life miserable for them; further notes that local authorities find the current law and regulations regarding odour control wholly inadequate to protect residents from offensive smells; and therefore urges the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to undertake an urgent review of the legislation and regulations regarding the control of offensive odours and specifically a review and strengthening of the provisions under BAT34 and SG8 to enable effective control by local authorities, and a review of the legislation relating to the transportation of animal by-products and the permitting of meat rendering plants and other odour-producing establishments.
That this House notes that residents who live in close proximity to meat rendering and other processing plants such as waste and recycling plants are frequently subject to appalling odours making life miserable for them; further notes that local authorities find the current law and regulations regarding odour control wholly...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what funding levels they propose for the regular measurement of noise, air and water pollution over the next three years.[HL3059]
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what funding levels they propose for the regular measurement of noise, air and water pollution over the next three years.[HL3059]
Evidence budgets for Defra, the Environment Agency and Natural England for the next and subsequent financial year have not yet been finalised. During the financial year 2013/14, Defra has allocated the following funds to regular measurements in these areas:
Air pollution: £5,980,000
Water pollution: approximately £19 million
This includes work carried out by the Environment Agency and Natural England.
Measurements undertaken for air pollution serve both statutory and research needs and include measurements of concentration in air, deposition of pollutants and quality assurance of data.
The Government does not routinely carry out noise measurements. Occasional studies are carried out to examine changes in noise level at particular locations and also any changes in noise level by time of day. One such study is nearing completion and cost approximately £220,000.
While there will be some reduction in budget in future years to help meet headline reductions in departmental spend, work is ongoing to establish the rate and level of such reductions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many incidents of ground water pollution his Department recorded in each year for which data is available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many incidents of ground water pollution his Department recorded in each year for which data is available.
The Environment Agency receives reports of over 23,000 incidents of pollution to land, air and water each year. These are recorded on the National Incident Recording System.
The Environment Agency is unable to provide the number of pollution incidents that involve groundwater only due to disproportionate cost. However, details of reported pollution incidents for water are:
| Number
of water pollution
incidents | |
| 2010 | 9,661 |
| 2011 | 9,577 |
| 2012 | 9,238 |
| 2013
(January to end
March) | 2,369 |
| 2013
(April to date (England
only)) | 4,523 |
| Note: Figures are provided for England and Wales except where specified. Source: National Incident Recording System |