Skip to main content

1-20 of 384 results for subject:"Licensing laws"

Year X
2009

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many applications for licences to sell alcohol by a person who had previously held a licence were refused in each of the last three years because he or she had served alcohol to a person who was inebriated.

Asked by
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 December 2009
Reference
502 c671W; 305395
House
House of Commons
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
10 December 2009
House
House of Commons
I am happy to take this issue up. I want people to have that opportunity. This should be a matter for far greater local discretion, and we will do our best to achieve that.
Answered by
Gordon Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 December 2009
Reference
502 c354
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Lead question not printed
Date
9 December 2009
Reference
502 c354; 304974
House
House of Commons
Last Sunday, the people of Northall in my constituency were unable to obtain a drinks licence for their annual lunch at the village hall because the Government-imposed limit of 15 for the year had been reached. Inquiries of Bedfordshire police suggested that neither the lunch nor the hall regularly featured in their investigations of binge drinking and loutish behaviour. Will the Prime Minister review the bureaucratic and unnecessary regulation that prompts these decisions and ensure a return to local discretion, which is how these decisions should be made, or will he make way for a Government who will?
Asked by
Alistair Burt (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 December 2009
Reference
502 c354
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when he expects the consultation on entertainment licences for public venues with capacity for under 100 persons to be published.

Asked by
Tobias Ellwood (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 December 2009
Reference
501 c853W; 303753
House
House of Commons

That this House notes the Government's decision to make charities and other not-for-profit organisations pay for a licence when they play recorded music in their own premises from April 2010; further notes the proposals would result in an unacceptable financial burden on the voluntary and community sector upwards of ??20...

Primary sponsor
Tom Levitt (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
1 December 2009
Reference
318; 318A1
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether his Department provides guidance on whether hon. Members and district councillors are included in the definition of 'interested parties' or 'responsible authorities' in section 13 of the Licensing Act 2003 and in the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations...

Asked by
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2009
Reference
501 c50W; 301073
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many applications for licences by a person who had previously held a licence were refused in each of the last three years because he or she had served alcohol to a person who was inebriated.

Asked by
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c951W; 299567
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 11/11/2009 from David Lammy MP to Peter Luff MP regarding music licensing review. Inc Government response. 39 p.

Deposited by
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
DEP2009-2834
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what comparative assessment they have made of the relative effects on communities of 24-hour alcohol licensing and cannabis remaining a class C drug.

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
6184; 714 c183-4WA
House
House of Lords

The amendments are variously technical, minor and consequential, and we support them. I add my thanks to everybody who has taken part in this process over the past year. The only group that we have forgotten is the humble parliamentary researchers, including mine who did all the work earlier in...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c417-8
House
House of Commons

I admire the Minister's elegant attempt to stay on the front foot on this issue, but let us be clear: this is a retreat. The Government had wanted to grow the DNA database as a primary policy principle, but they cannot do that now. They wanted to retain profiles on...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411-4
House
House of Commons

The amendments were supported by the Government in the other place and are the result of listening to the debates that have taken place in this House and in Committees of both Houses, including the Joint Committee on Human Rights and the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee. Over the...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411
House
House of Commons

We have brought forward measures that were not only debated in Parliament, but subject to considerable debate outside Parliament. There has been a long consultation with the public on the measures, and over that time scale additional research has been undertaken, so we cannot be accused of seeking a blank...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c415-6
House
House of Commons

Lords amendments 40, 41 and 42 are very welcome, because they remove the Government's attempt to give themselves a blank cheque to act on such a controversial issue, whereby in light of the European ruling on DNA, they would say, "We'll go away and come up with suggestions in private....

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c414-5
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 40.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 43.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c416
House
House of Commons

I support Lords amendment 43, which clarifies the rules across the country. It is interesting to note that the provisions of the amendment already apply in Northern Ireland, as one of the subsequent amendments shows, and it therefore seems a sensible proposal to adopt. I thank the Minister for his...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c417
House
House of Commons

Lords amendments 43 and 45 are proposed changes to section 23 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, and the Government introduced them in another place. They were proposed as a result of late representations from the Scottish Crime and Drugs Enforcement Agency. The proposed changes are simply clarifying measures....

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c416-7
House
House of Commons