Skip to main content

1-20 of 302 results for subject:Devolution

Year X
2009
Subject X
Non-departmental public bodies

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Non-departmental public bodies (302)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords question for short debate on whether they will take forward legislative proposals for constitutional reform presently before the House of Lords.

Lead member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch
Answering member
Lord Bach
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c520-35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, on bringing this matter before us and on his interesting speech. I also congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Willoughby de Broke, on bringing the Bill before the House and on having the opportunity to discuss it. His Constitutional Reform Bill is...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c523-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, on raising this Question. I shall focus on the Government’s proposals for constitutional change. They may be somewhat less radical than those proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Willoughby de Broke, but they may, arguably, stand a greater chance of...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c524-5
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will take forward legislative proposals for constitutional reform presently before the House of Lords.

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c520
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to noble Lords who are to speak in this short debate. It is a trial run at the Constitutional Reform Bill of my noble friend Lord Willoughby de Broke, which is to be found in the Printed Paper Office. That Bill is not having...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c520-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are all grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, for this debate, not least because the title gives us an opportunity to speak about all sorts of issues, rather than simply concentrate on the Bill introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Willoughby de Broke. I feel that...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c528-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, that it is difficult to do justice in six minutes to the Bill of the noble Lord, Lord Willoughby de Broke, which is probably the biggest constitutional Bill that we have seen in our lifetime in terms of what it...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c530-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill to which the noble Lord, Lord Pearson of Rannoch, referred in his opening comments has 25 clauses and provides for major local government reform, major House of Lords reform, major House of Commons reform, the repeal of the human rights legislation, withdrawal from the EU and...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c525-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend Lord Pearson for so eloquently introducing the Bill in my name, which had its First Reading about a month ago. In the time allowed I will touch briefly on only three points. Since both the noble Lords, Lord Grocott and...

Member
Lord Willoughby de Broke (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c527-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Pearson of Rannoch, on introducing this debate and agree with the noble Lord, Lord Henley, that we do not really have time tonight to debate this matter fully. At this particular time, as all speakers have said, constitutional reform is a...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2009
Reference
712 c531-5
House
House of Lords

Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage fifth day. Clauses 50 to 65 agreed to, with clauses 57, 59, 62 and 63 agreed to as amended. Schedule 6 agreed to as amended. Clause 66 under consideration.

Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c11-73,80-96
House
House of Lords

I am extremely grateful to my noble friend for the reassurances that he is offering the Committee. I assure him that I am always disposed to forgive him. I am still puzzled that the Minister is so reluctant even to specify statutory consultees, let alone itemise who they might be,...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c50
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for tabling the amendments and those around the House who have spoken in her support and for raising the important issue of protection of our marine and maritime heritage, in particular. My noble friend is right to draw attention to the fact that there is...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c47
House
House of Lords

I wish to add a further word in support of my noble friend Lady Hooper, and also to reflect on the comments of others. I understand that originally there were plans in the green Bill that it should be included. Will the Minister tell us why it was then dropped...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c47-8
House
House of Lords

I sincerely apologise to the Committee, particularly the noble Baroness, Lady Hooper, for missing the first minute or so of her speech. I was serving in another committee of the House which was meeting upstairs, and this Committee has moved rather faster this afternoon than I anticipated. I and my...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c44-6
House
House of Lords

I intervene for the first time on the Bill. I had intended to speak at Second Reading but had to withdraw due to the timetabling of that debate. If I had spoken, I would have focused my remarks almost entirely on the coastal aspect part of the Bill, which we...

Member
Lord Chorley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c46-7
House
House of Lords

After that very erudite contribution by my noble friend perhaps I may add just a general word. I should say that I am honorary president of the Friends of the Royal Naval Museum. In that capacity I am very concerned by what my noble friend is putting forward. I think...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c44
House
House of Lords

I rise to support Amendments 91 and 92, to which I have put my name. The noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, said it all: this is the perennial argument that we had in debating the Planning Bill, and will have here, about the relationship between national infrastructure decisions and the marine...

Member
Baroness Young of Old Scone (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c57-8
House
House of Lords

This amendment was tabled by my noble friend Lord Greaves, who has attached the name of my noble friend Lord Tyler to it; I do not know whether he was aware of that. The noble Baroness, Lady Young, has her name to it and to Amendment 92, I am glad...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c56-7
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister confirm my reading of the Bill that the direction could designate a statutory undertaker as a public body? Statutory undertakers now are largely private sector. If I read it right, I have a question mark over that provision.

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
708 c53
House
House of Lords