Skip to main content

1-20 of 146 results for subject:Roads

Year X
2005
Subject X
Sales

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Sales (146)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I congratulate my right hon. Friend on the work that she did to secure the success of the Olympic bid, but in terms of being able to spread the benefits of the Olympics around the country, can she also give consideration to the fact that, if contracts are going to...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1437
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right and it is for that reason that we have on the face of the Bill given regional development authorities a responsibility in this respect, which would by implication extend not just to bidding for contracts but to seeking to maximise the tourism benefits of...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1437
House
House of Commons

In addition to the role of the regional development agencies, which I have outlined, the nations and regions committee that was established by the bid team will continue to underpin the efforts to secure the maximum UK-wide benefit of preparation camps and the other potential opportunities that I have outlined,...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1437-8
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend give way?

Member
Andrew Love (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1438
House
House of Commons

Northampton is in the middle of one of the Government’s growth areas and therefore well placed to help with the regeneration process. Will my right hon. Friend ensure that towns that might want to provide training facilities, provide support for teams or provide premises for different sports will be able...

Member
Sally Keeble (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1437
House
House of Commons

No. The importance of the ODA to the Olympic project is evident—a single body with a clear task, accountable to Parliament. The ODA will be a time-limited body, focused on delivering the London games, and clause 7 therefore provides for the Secretary of State, having consulted the Mayor, to lay...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1438-9
House
House of Commons

Please give way.

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439
House
House of Commons

No; I am going to make some progress. The Olympic delivery authority will be the planning authority for the Olympic park. As I said, to ensure propriety, planning decisions will be taken by a discrete planning committee.

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1438
House
House of Commons

Before the Secretary of State moves on, will she give way?

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1438
House
House of Commons

I think, with respect, that the hon. Lady is confusing two things. The LDA is negotiating relocation with up to some 350 businesses and I do not wish to be drawn on detailed negotiations of a contractual nature. The LDA is the proper body to negotiate with those business and...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439
House
House of Commons

I will give way on planning.

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to the right hon. Lady because this could reduce the length of my speech. Under clause 4, which refers to the ODA’s planning powers, she herself said in her earlier comments that the LDA is in negotiation with roughly 350 businesses at present, but under the...

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give way?

Member
Lord McLoughlin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439
House
House of Commons

I shall move on to reaffirm and underline the importance of the points made by a number of hon. Members in interventions about the benefits that we hope will extend to the whole United Kingdom. In clause 34, regional development agencies are given a new purpose—to prepare for the London...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439
House
House of Commons

I add my voice to the congratulations to my right hon. Friend on the role that she played in winning the bid. A number of provisions in the Bill are designed to ensure that the priority is to deliver the games by 2012. Is she confident that the Bill contains...

Member
Andrew Love (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1439-40
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention and pay tribute to his advocacy of the Olympic bid and the regeneration of the lower Lea valley, which will bring great benefits to his constituents. He has been an advocate for many years when the Olympic bid did not have many...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1440
House
House of Commons

I have been waiting patiently to say something nice to the right hon. Lady. May I say on behalf of the Scottish National party how sincerely and wholeheartedly we congratulate London on securing the games? It is incumbent upon her to match the rhetoric and demonstrate that it truly was...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1441
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that intervention, which was well worth waiting for. He has been consistent in at least one respect—his opposition to using lottery funds to meet the costs of the Olympics. That will not change. That is the way the public contribution will be met, in...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1441
House
House of Commons

My point is about regeneration and the protection of existing communities. In the boroughs surrounding Stratford and the other sites, there are many very poor people. There are also many artistic communities that have limited and low cost facilities. Will the Secretary of State ensure that the games do not...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1440
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that important point. I hope he will be reassured in part by the fact that the Olympic village will represent a substantial contribution to London’s affordable housing. Working with the communities around the Stratford park and the lower Lea valley has been an important...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2005
Reference
436 c1440-1
House
House of Commons