1-3 of 3 results for subject:Insurance
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.184 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Insurance
- We searched for
- subject_t:Insurance OR subject_ses:91687
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
More
Benn, Hilary (3)
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the Criminal Records Bureau.
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the Criminal Records Bureau.
Lead member
Paul Burstow
Answering member
Hilary Benn
Department
Home Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Criminal records; Administrative delays; Commercial secrets; Fees and charges; ICT; Liability; Insurance; Forms; Older people; Standards; Vetting; Voluntary work; Criminal Records Bureau; Capita
Date
30 April 2003
Reference
404 c103-25WH
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his Statement of 27th February, 400 c32-6WS, on the Criminal Records Bureau, what implications the increased requirement for bodies registered with the Criminal Records Bureau to verify applicant's identity will have for their public liability insurance. (Reprinted in...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his Statement of 27th February, 400 c32-6WS, on the Criminal Records Bureau, what implications the increased requirement for bodies registered with the Criminal Records Bureau to verify applicant's identity will have for their public liability insurance. (Reprinted in...
Asked by
Paul Burstow
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Hilary Benn
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
28 February 2003
For answer on
13 March 2003
Answered on
13 March 2003
Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to his statement of 27 February 2003, Official Report,
columns 32-36WS, on the Criminal Records Bureau, what implications the increased requirement for bodies registered with the Criminal
Records Bureau to verify applicant's identity will have for their public liability insurance. [101033]
Hilary Benn: We will address any evidence that may be presented to us on these matters, under the current consultation exercise on
the recommendations of the independent review team.
Under guidance issued by the Criminal Records Bureau, registered bodies are already required to verify the identity of persons,
applying for a disclosure; in implementing the independent review team's second recommendation we are simply seeking to formalise
this requirement. We are currently consulting registered bodies on the implications for them of recommendations and will consider
any representations made about the impact on their insurance premiums.
Subjects
Liability; Insurance; Criminal Records Bureau
Date
13 March 2003
Reference
101033; 401 c393W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many (a) hit and run accidents, (b) hit and run accidents whose driver did not have insurance and (c) hit and run drivers taken to court and (i) fined, (ii) imprisoned and (iii) acquitted there were in each of...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many (a) hit and run accidents, (b) hit and run accidents whose driver did not have insurance and (c) hit and run drivers taken to court and (i) fined, (ii) imprisoned and (iii) acquitted there were in each of...
Asked by
Paul Burstow
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Hilary Benn
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
13 February 2003
For answer on
4 March 2003
Answered on
4 March 2003
Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for he Home Department how many (a) hit-and-run accidents, (b) hit-and-run accidents
whose driver did not have insurance and (c) hit-and-run drivers taken to court and (i) fined, (ii) imprisoned and (iii) acquitted
there were in each of the last five years; and what percentage of these fines remain unpaid. [98724]
Hilary Benn: Department for Transport figures are given in the following table for the number of hit-and- run accidents in England
and Wales for the years 1997-2001.
It is not possible, in the statistics collected centrally, to distinguish offences relating to a "hit-and-run" accident from
offences resulting from other kinds of accidents. Motorists charged following a "hit-and-run" will e charged with an offence
appropriate to the circumstances. This may often be failing to stop after an accident or failing to report an accident, but more
serious charges may be preferred in some cases depending on the circumstances.
Table B shows available data on motoring offences within England and Wales, as defined in section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988,
for failing to stop after an accident or failing to report an accident within 24 hours. The figures shown are the numbers of
offences, rather than the numbers of offenders.
Data on the number of cases where drivers were convicted for insurance offences, (under section 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988,
using motor vehicle uninsured against third party risks), as well as the offences of failing to stop after an accident or failing to
report an accident within 24 hours are given in table C.
Information on fines unpaid by offence is not collected centrally.
Table A--The number of hit-and-run accidents, England and Wales, 1997-2001
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Year Total
1997 17,456
1998 17,564
1999 19,023
2000 21,591
2001 23,757
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Table B--Proceedings at magistrates courts and outcome at all courts for the motoring offences of failing to stop after an accident,
etc. and failing to report an accident within 24 hours-- England and Wales
Number of offences
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Year/ Total proceedings Acquittals1 Fine Immediate custody2
offence
Failing to stop after accident, etc. (Road Traffic Act 1988 s170(4))
1997 15,829 935 6,760 319
1998 15,387 861 6,299 387
1999 14,923 790 5,922 406
2000 14,663 754 5,658 403
2001 15,392 784 5,411 396
Failing to report accident within 24 hours (Road Traffic Act 1988 s170(4) and (7))
1997 13,092 830 4,419 142
1998 12,876 773 3,944 176
1999 12,336 721 3,603 192
2000 12,029 684 3,283 189
2001 12,377 705 3,092 168
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
1 Includes cases dismissed at the magistrates courts under the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 s9 and acquittals at the Crown Court. 2
Includes unsuspended sentence of imprisonment, young offender institution, secure training order (1998-2000) and detention and
training order (2000 onwards).
Table C--The number of convictions for insurance offences1 where drivers were also convicted for failing to stop after an accident
or failing to report an accident within 24 hours, England and Wales, 1997-2001
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Year Total number
1997 4,207
1998 4,339
1999 4,428
2000 4,446
2001 4,742
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
1 Section 143, Road Traffic Act 1988--using motor vehicle uninsured against third party risks.
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Accidents; Convictions; Fines; Insurance; Prison sentences; Roads; Road traffic offences; Acquittals; Unpaid fines
Date
4 March 2003
Reference
98724; 400 c974-6W;400 c964-5W
House
House of Commons