Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:Extradition

Answering member X
Lord Triesman

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Triesman, Lord (14)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have made representations to the Government of Zimbabwe concerning the human rights of Simon Mann, in light of recent reports that he may be deported from Zimbabwe to Equatorial Guinea.

Asked by
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
3771; 692 c180WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Why, when Lord Triesman said on 30 March 2006 that ““we are taking a close and active interest in the case of Mr Ali Manzarpour, and we are looking after the rights of Mr Manzarpour as well as we can”” (Official Report, col. 852), Baroness Scotland of...

Asked by
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 June 2007
Reference
692 c155WA; 3967
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have made representations to the Government of Chile in support of Peru's request for the extradition from Chile of former President Alberto Fujimori, to face charges related tohuman rights violations, corruption and money laundering.

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 2007
Reference
3375; 691 c187WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will make representations to the Government of the United States regarding the possible use of shackling or leg irons by the United States authorities on British nationals extradited to the United States who have not been convicted of any crime.

Asked by
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 2006
Reference
6823; 684 c149WA
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the United States has a straightforward ban on exports to Iran, which might be regarded as excessive in the House or elsewhere, but it is at least clear. It is going no further in this case, so far as I can tell, but it is putting these matters into its extradition case in the Polish courts. It is an open-court procedure. The whole argument for and against will be heard and has been heard thus far in the Polish courts.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c851-2
House
House of Lords
My Lords, in general—not in this particular case—issues concerning the transfers of technology and when they do or do not comply with United Nations regulations are discussed regularly with the United States. I do not intend to speculate in the House today about whether there will be further sanctions. We are not at that point. We want a discussion in the Security Council about Iran and its current nuclear programme, a matter on which we have exchanged views in the House frequently, and I do not think that it would be appropriate to make those discussions more difficult by speculating on whether sanctions will be the result of them.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c852-3
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I hoped that I had expressed the view in an earlier answer that Mr Manzarpour had gone through the processes and had obtained the permits that he needed lawfully in the United Kingdom. At least one of the items—the biplane—was sourced from the United States. It takes the view that that was in contravention of its law and that is the basis on which it sought the international warrant. I am clear in my own mind that the United States has a right to do so under its law, and it is a matter for the Polish authorities to consider whether they have to comply with the request for extradition.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c852
House
House of Lords
My Lords, Mr Ali Manzarpour was arrested in Poland on 17 February 2005 under a US-issued international arrest warrant requesting his extradition to the US on charges that he attempted to export a biplane from the United States to Iran via the UK illegally and other items from the US to Iran via Austria illegally.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c851
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I can confirm that Mr Manzarpour is not a United States citizen. I do not know whether he has ever visited the United States, so I am not in a position to answer that. With regard to the exports, he had applied to the United Kingdom authorities for a licence to export a light aircraft to Iran, and it was issued on 26 May 2004. The application was circulated for advice to the FCO and to the MoD, as normal, and was considered against published criteria. That is the position, as we understand it. We believe that that is the position in European law, although I understand that some lawyers who are expert in European law may have a different view. The United States believes that there is a founded case. I cannot answer for Polish law, because the case is before Poland’s courts at the moment.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c851
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the appeal court ruled that the case should be sent back to a regional court to be considered again under a new judge. We are monitoring that situation closely and have made clear our continuing interest. It does not appear to me to be uncommon that, in general, cases take a long time to go through the courts in Poland. The facts as the noble and learned Lord has put them are right: for just over 12 months Mr Manzarpour has been in custody and without bail. I understand the proposition that is made. We are taking a close and active interest in the case, and we are looking after the rights of Mr Manzarpour as well as we can.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c852
House
House of Lords
For how long and for what reasons Mr Ali Manzarpour, a British-Iranian dual national, has been held in a Polish prison in connection with extradition proceedings to the United States.
Asked by
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2006
Reference
680 c851
House
House of Lords

What representations they have made to the governments of the United States and Poland about the case of Mr Ali Manzarpour, a British citizen, concerning the application by the Government of the United States for his extradition from Poland to the United States.

Asked by
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 March 2006
Reference
679 c231WA; 4444
House
House of Lords

Whether they will take steps to secure the release of Mr Ali Manzarpour, a British citizen, following the decision of a Polish court to extradite him to the United States.

Asked by
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
679 c14WA; 4031
House
House of Lords

What are the current circumstances of Mr   Manzarpour, a British citizen, in connection with his extradition to the United States.

Asked by
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 2006
Reference
3979; 679 c14WA
House
House of Lords