Search Results

1-20 of 38 results for subject:"Private finance initiative"

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, pursuant to his Answer of 25th February, Official Report, 431 c90-2W, how many of the homes to be provided for rent in 2005-06 will be funded through (a) the Approved Development Programme, (b) the Approved Development Programme Challenge Fund, (c) Transitional Local Authority Social...

Asked by

Matthew Green (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

16 March 2005

For answer on

23 March 2005

Answered on

23 March 2005

Matthew Green: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to his answer of 25 February 2005, Official Report, columns 90-92W, how many of the homes to be provided for rent in 2005-06 will be funded through (a) the Approved Development Programme, (b) the Approved Development Programme Challenge Fund, (c) Transitional Local Authority Social Housing Grant, (d) the expanded Private Finance Initiative, (e) planning gain without public subsidy and (f) other funding streams. [223297] Keith Hill: The following table shows current estimates of the number of homes to be provided for rent in 2005-06 by the various categories requested. _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Number (a) Approved Development Programme 20,000 (b) Approved Development Programme Challenge 700 Fund (c) Transitional Local Authority Social 2,200 Housing Grant (d) Private Finance Initiative 500 (e) Planning gain without public subsidy 1,300 (f) Other funding streams 800 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Estimates for sections (a) -(c) are based on Housing Corporation data as at 18 March. The reduction in the total estimate is due solely to a lower estimate in Transitional Local Authority Social Housing Grant completions for 2005-06 and reflects detailed timing of outputs.

Date

23 March 2005

Reference

432 c843-4W; 223297

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what estimate he has made of the costs incurred by (a) the London Borough of Camden and (b) his Department in the four years of preparatory development work on the Decent Homes Standard Private Finance Initiative in that authority.

Asked by

Matthew Green (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 March 2005

Reference

432 c646W; 223286

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how many of the new social rented homes that will be delivered through the expanded Private Finance Initiative by 2007-08 will be provided in each Government Office region.

Asked by

Matthew Green (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 March 2005

Reference

432 c645W; 223281

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how many social rented homes have been (a) built and (b) acquired through the Private Finance Initiative mechanism that will be expanded under Sustainable Communities: Homes for all.

Asked by

Matthew Green (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 March 2005

Reference

432 c643W; 223282

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, if he will list those local authorities which have undertaken (a) arm's length management organisation, (b) large scale voluntary transfer and (c) private finance initiative programmes with regard to their social housing provision; how many and what percentage of local authorities have not yet...

Asked by

Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 March 2005

Reference

432 c644-5W; 223049;223050;223051

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, if he will make a statement on his decision to withdraw support from the Private Finance Initiative scheme to bring part of the council housing stock in the London Borough of Camden up to the Decent Homes Standard.

Asked by

Matthew Green (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 March 2005

Reference

432 c645-6W; 223285

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how many of the 10,000 new social rented homes that are planned to be built in 2007-08 will be delivered through the expanded private finance initiative; and if he will make a statement. - Inc figure.

Asked by

Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

25 February 2005

Reference

217570; 431 c901W;431 c897W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what progress has been made with each of the Pathfinder private finance initiative housing schemes.

Asked by

Colin Burgon (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

31 January 2005

Reference

211914; 430 c648W;430 c648-9W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what systems he is putting in place to monitor the delivery of planned improvements to properties transferred under (a) large scale voluntary transfer, (b) arms length management organisations and (c) private finance initiative schemes.

Asked by

Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

11 January 2005

For answer on

18 January 2005

Answered on

18 January 2005

Mr. Edward Davey: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what systems he is putting in place to monitor the delivery of planned improvements to properties transferred under (a) large scale voluntary transfer, (b) arms length management organisations and (c) private finance initiative schemes. [208392] Keith Hill: The arms length management organisations (ALMO), large scale voluntary transfer (LSVT) and private finance initiatives (PFI) for housing revenue account (HRA) housing programmes are intended to achieve the Government's decent homes PSA 7 target by December 2010 and to deliver wider improvements to social housing stock and services. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister will be tracking progress against the decent homes target through local authority, ALMO and registered social landlord (RSL) monitoring returns and the English house condition survey (EHCS). In addition, each programme has its own monitoring and evaluation system to track annual progress and provide longer-term assessments of the outcomes and value for money of the different programmes. The monitoring and evaluation systems apply to LSVTs from the 2001 programme onwards, all ALMO rounds, and all PFI for housing revenue account schemes. The systems collect a range of data to track progress towards the decent homes target, delivery of promises to tenants, tenant satisfaction, delivery of housing services, and linkages to wider estate and area regeneration. Where possible, these systems are based on data that is already collected by individual schemes to reduce the burden of further data collection.

Date

18 January 2005

Reference

208392; 429 c868W;429 c872-3W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, which authorities have decided their stock options appraisal in favour of (a) stock transfer, (b) arm's length management organisation, (c) private finance initiative and (d) stock retention by the council; how many homes each authority has in each case; which authorities have yet to...

Asked by

Austin Mitchell (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

6 December 2004

Reference

200319; 428 c345W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, which local authorities have (a) started and (b) completed their consultation with tenants on (i) arm's length management organisations (ALMOs), (ii) use of the private finance initiative and (iii) use of stock transfer in relation to ownership of housing; which of those authorities have...

Asked by

Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

22 October 2004

For answer on

28 October 2004

Answered on

28 October 2004

Simon Hughes: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister which local authorities have (a) started and (b) completed their consultation with tenants on (i) arm's length management organisations (ALMOs), (ii) use of the private finance initiative and (iii) use of stock transfer in relation to ownership of housing; which of those authorities have held ballots with their tenants on ALMOs, PFI and stock transfer; when those ballots were held; and what percentage was (A) in favour and (B) against each option in each such ballot. [193887] Keith Hill: Consultation with tenants occurs throughout the Options Appraisal process. Local authorities are all required to go through this process, but an Options Appraisal will not be signed off unless the Government Office is satisfied that tenants are properly consulted. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister would normally consider a ballot to be the most formal type of consultation with tenants. These are normally only undertaken for transfer and Arm's Length Management Organisations (ALMOs). Although ballots are not generally undertaken for PFI schemes, tenants are required to be consulted and section 27 consent must be given. Tabled is a detailed breakdown of the figures requested. It covers all ballots since the Decent Homes Programme began in 2001, including partials, and shows that 73 ballots have taken place for transfer, while 18 have balloted tenants successfully for Arm's Length Management Programmes. 42 local authorities have had their Options Appraisals signed off by Government Offices. 150 local authorities have not had Options Appraisals signed off, and so are either engaging with tenants or about to do so. Transfer ballots since 2001 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Local authority Against Ballot date In favour 2001 Programme Birmingham April 2002 43.2 66.8 Carlisle CC June/July 2002 52.0 48 Chelmsford BC September 2001 55.7 54.3 City of Bradford March 2002 62.2 37.8 Craven September 2002 75.6 24.4 Crewe and Nantwich BC February 2002 64.9 35.1 Derbyshire Dales DC June/July 2001 69.3 30.7 Dudley November 2001 43.8 56.2 East Herts DC November 2001 76.4 23.6 Erewash June/July 2001 75 25 Herefordshire C April 2002 57.7 42.3 Knowsley MBC November/ 73.9 26.1 December 2001 LB Hackney (sheltered stock) November/ 71 29 December 2001 LB Harrow March 2002 74.6 25.4 LB Merton (partial) July 2002 48.5 51.5 LB Waltham Forest (partial) January 02 62.3 37.7 Liverpool CC--Eastern Fringe March 2002 87.8 12.2 (Central) Liverpool CC--Eastern Fringe March 2002 66.4 33.6 (North) Liverpool CC--Eastern Fringe March 2002 78.5 21.5 (South) Manchester CC--Langley Estates November 2001 68 32 Mid Bedfordshire DC March/April 2001 51 49 Redcar and Cleveland BC August 2001 89 11 Reigate and Banstead BC August 2001 80.8 19.2 Shrewsbury and Atcham BC March/April 2001 64.7 35.3 St. Edmundsbury BC September 2001 71.5 28.5 LB Southwark (partial) November/ 26 73.1 December 2001 St. Helens MBC October 2001 83 17 Vale Royal BC November 2001 85.2 14.8 Walsall October 2001 71 29 Walsall July 2002 74.1 25.9 2002 Programme Amber Valley BC August 2002 56.9 43.1 Bromsgrove DC July 2003 67.8 32.2 Cherwell DC July 2003 59.1 40.9 Copeland BC July 2003 78 22 Forest of Dean DC July 2002 69.1 30.9 LB Ealing (Havelock) October/ 47.6 52.4 November 2002 Liverpool CC (Kensington) November 2003 61.3 38.7 Maidstone BC March 2003 61.3 38.7 Manchester C (Carbrook) April 2003 95.1 4.9 Manchester C (East Manchester) December 2002 68 32 North Hertfordshire July 2002 59.9 40.1 Nuneaton and Bedworth BC April 2003 40.3 59.7 Oldham MBC (Limeside) October 2002 87 13 Oldham MBC (Fitton Hill) July 2003 83 17 Rushcliffe BC July 2003 52.1 37.9 Scarborough BC December 2002 71.7 28.3 South Norfolk C July 2003 68 32 Stockport MBC March 2003 45 55 Teignbridge DC March 2003 64.5 35.5 Worcester July 2003 75 25 2003 Programme Forest Heath DC December 2003 57.9 42.1 Hartlepool BC July 2003 75 25 LB Hackney (Kings Crescent) December 2002 79 21 LB Islington (Grove) July 2004 72.8 27.2 LB Islington (Surr Street) July 2004 55.8 44.2 LB Islington (Tollington) November 2003 39.9 60.1 LB Lambeth (Kennington Park) July 2004 60 40 LB Tower Hamlets (Crossways) October 2004 90 10 LB Tower Hamlets (Mile End) June 2004 55.9 44.1 Manchester CC (Woodhouse Park) March 2004 92.7 7.3 Middlesbrough February 2004 77.1 22.9 North East Lincolnshire May 2004 67.3 32.7 Peterborough CC December 2003 81.5 18.5 Purbeck DC October 2003 69.7 30.3 RB Kingston May 2004 63 37 South Norfolk July 2003 68 38 Stroud DC November 2003 43.2 56.7 Trafford MBC March 2004 72.9 27.1 Wakefield MDC February 2004 74 26 Wirral MBC April 2004 77.36 22.64 2004 Programme Tower Hamlets (Tarling East) August 2004 77.1 22.9 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. ALMO Ballots since 2001 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Local authority Ballot date In favour Against ALMO Round 1 Derby February 2002 88 12 Hounslow March 2002 83 17 Kirklees December 2001 81 19 Rochdale February 2002 90 10 Stockton-on-Tees February 2002 93 7 ALMO Round 2 Carrick January 2002 96 4 Colchester July 2003 76 24 Leeds--East June 2002 83 17 Leeds--North East June 2002 88 12 Leeds--North West July 2002 89 11 Leeds--South August 2002 91 9 Leeds--South East September 2002 88 12 Leeds--West October 2002 90 10 Waltham Forest October 2002 85 15 ALMO Round 3 Camden December 2003 23 17 Harrow March 2003 73 27 High Peak August 2003 98 2 Islington November 2003 85 15 Sheffield: Brightside and December 2003 78 12 Shiregreen Sheffield: Central Area December 2003 87 13 South Lakeland October 2003 88 12 ALMO Round 4 Bassetlaw May 2004 88 12 Hammersmith and Fulham October 2003 83 17 Nottingham July 2004 76 24 Sheffield: Hillsborough, Nether March 2004 87 13 Thorpe Sheffield: Parson Cross, Foxhill, March 2004 94 6 Longley Sheffield: Westfield, March 2004 89 11 Hackenthorpe _________________________________________________________________________________________________. PFI schemes since 2001 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Local authority Date In favour Against Schemes balloted on since 2001 Leeds March 2002 46 54 Camden March 2004 20 80 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Schemes with section 27 consent since 2001 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Date Islington March 2003 Manchester March 2003 Reading March 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Date

28 October 2004

Reference

425 c1324-8W; 193887

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what proportion of council-owned homes are directly run by the council. - Inc figures.

Asked by

John Hayes (Conservative)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

7 September 2004

Reference

424 c1159-61W;424 c1169W; 187329

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what the latest figure is for the average cost per unit of (a) improving a local authority-owned home to the Government's Decent Homes Standard and (b) the equivalent cost for a former local authority home that has been transferred into alternative management and/or ownership...

Asked by

Brian Iddon (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 July 2004

Reference

184107; 424 c559W;424 c559-60W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how many local authorities in England have chosen (a) stock transfer, (b) arm's length management and (c) private finance initiative. - Inc figures.

Asked by

Adam Price (Plaid Cymru)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

24 June 2004

Reference

180185; 422 c1476W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how much investment to fund stock improvements has been secured via transfer, private finance initiative and arm's length management organisations since the Housing Green Paper was published in 2000, broken down by local authority; and how much of the backlog of repairs and improvement...

Asked by

Austin Mitchell (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

26 May 2004

For answer on

10 June 2004

Answered on

10 June 2004

Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much investment to fund stock improvements has been secured via transfer, private finance initiative and Arm's Length Management Organisations since the Housing Green Paper was published in 2000, broken down by local authority; and how much of the backlog of repairs and improvement remains to be funded. [176756] Keith Hill: The following tables show the level of additional investment secured by ALMO PFI and LSVT since 2000. These figures do not include mainstream housing funding paid to stock owning local authorities including those that have established ALMOs or PFI contracts. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is not in a position to update or estimate the reduction since 2001 of the repairs and improvement backlog until we have sufficient data from the English House Condition Survey, the next report of which will be published by the end of this year. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister needs this independent assessment, as we cannot determine the remaining backlog by simply deducting the sums spent from the previous backlog estimate. This is because the expenditure is used to both reduce the backlog and to stop the backlog increasing. LSVT _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Authority Date of transfer Private investment (£ million) Manchester CC (Colshaw Farm) 14 February 2000 30.00 North Devon DC 21 February 2000 70.00 LB Hackney* Stamford Hill 6 March 2000 35.00 LB Hackney* Pembury Estate 6 March 2000 33.90 Burnley BC 8 March 2000 45.00 Manchester CC Sale Estate 20 March 2000 23.00 Weymouth and Portland C 20 March 2000 55.00 Huntingdon DC 20 March 2000 95.00 Elmbridge BC 27 March 2000 93.00 Test Valley BC 27 March 2000 111.00 Wyre Forest DC 27 March 2000 80.00 Manchester CC Whitefield Estate 27 March 2000 20.00 LB Tower Hamlets* THCH 27 March 2000 45.00 Tameside 27 March 2000 213.00 MBC LB Richmond 17 July 2000 173.00 Coventry CC 22 September 2000 240.00 Fylde BC 2 October 2000 30.00 Chester CC 27 November 2000 90.00 Horsham DC 11 December 2000 100.00 LB Tower Hamlets* Poplar I 12 February 2001 33.00 East Northamptonshire DC 19 February 2001 60.00 Torbay BC 19 February 2001 50.00 Staffordshire Moorlands DC 23 February 2001 50.00 Calderdale MBC 6 March 2001 112.00 Chichester DC 13 March 2001 120.00 Mendip DC 19 March 2001 70.00 West Wiltshire DC 26 March 2001 100.00 West Oxfordshire DC 26 March 2001 75.00 East Staffordshire BC 26 March 2001 62.00 Manchester CC Handforth Estate 26 March 2001 17.00 Sunderland CC 26 March 2001 425.00 Blackburn with Darwen BC 28 March 2001 85.00 Shrewsbury and Atcham BC 1 October 2001 82.00 Mid-Bedfordshire DC 5 November 2001 50.00 Derbyshire Dales 4 March 2002 59.00 Chelmsford BC 11 March 2002 145.00 East Hertfordshire DC 18 March 2002 50.00 DC 57.00 Erewash BC 25 March 2002 99.00 Reigate and Banstead BC 25 March 2002 105.50 St. Edmundsbury 24 June 2002 91.00 Vale Royal BC 1 July 2002 90.00 St. Helens MBC 1 July 2002 129.00 Redcar and Cleveland BC 15 July 2002 180.00 Knowsley MBC 15 July 2002 180.00 LB Waltham Forest 30 September 2002 175.00 LB Hackney cc sheltered stock 14 October 2002 25.00 LB Harrow 14 October 2002 55.00 Manchester cc Langley Estate 18 November 2002 28.00 County of Herefordshire C 25 November 2002 63.00 Carlisle CC 9 December 2002 63.50 Rushcliffe BC 20 January 2003 55.00 Liverpool CC Eastern Fringe (south) 23 January 2003 25.50 Liverpool CC Eastern Fringe (central) 30 January 2003 17.50 City of Bradford 24 February 2003 245.10 Amber Valley BC 24 February 2003 94.00 Crewe and Nantwich BC 10 March 2003 54.00 Liverpool CC Eastern fringe (north) 10 March 2003 64.50 Oldham MBC Limeside (Hollins/The Avenues) 17 March 2003 12.00 Walsall MBC (majority of stock) 27 March 2003 213.00 Walsall MBC (tenant managed stock) 27 March 2003 7.20 Craven DC 31 March 2003 15.00 Forest of Dean DC 31 March 2003 50.00 North Hertfordshire DC 31 March 2003 182.00 Manchester CC (East Manchester) 8 September 2003 25.00 Scarborough BC 15 December 2003 43.00 Maidstone BC 2 February 2004 50.00 Teignbridge 4 February 2004 45.00 Oldham MBC Fitton Hill 15 March 2004 8.50 Cherwell 29 March 2004 50.00 Bromsgrove 29 March 2004 49.00 Hartlepool 29 March 2004 65.00 Liverpool (Kensington) 29 March 2004 19.00 Worcester 31 March 2004 55.00 South Norfolk 17 May 2004 55.00 Total 5,118.30 ALMO allowance (£) Local authority 2002-03 2003-04 Round 1 ALMOs Ashfield 1,012,603 2,400,000 Derby 1,312,164 3,110,000 Hounslow 1,179,452 3,500,000 Kirklees 1,917,808 6,250,000 Rochdale 835,397 2,420,000 Stockton-on-Tees 1,353,288 4,450,000 Westminster 745,260 2,030,000 Wigan 1,788,932 5,830,000 Round 2 ALMOs Barnsley -- 1,856,885 Blyth Valley -- 1,329,235 Bolton -- 2,619,654 Brent -- 2,342,213 Carrick -- 109,098 Cheltenham -- 422,131 Hillingdon -- 86,175 Kensington and Chelsea -- 1,580,334 Leeds--North East -- 447,072 Leeds--West -- 778,210 Oldham -- 3,033,211 Total 10,144,904 44,594,218 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. PFI _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Authority PFI credits (£ million) Manchester 36.64 Islington 74.69 Reading 49.65 Total 160.98 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Date

10 June 2004

Reference

176756; 422 c494-6W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how many houses have been brought up to the Government's Decent Homes Standards by (a) registered social landlords, (b) arm's length management organisations, (c) councils and (d) the Public Finance Initiative since targets were fixed; and what proportion these numbers constitute of each sector's...

Asked by

Austin Mitchell (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 May 2004

Reference

173669; 421 c1048-9W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how many PFI projects have been undertaken within the remit of the housing and planning section of his Office since private finance initiative projects were introduced.

Asked by

John Hayes (Conservative)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 April 2004

Reference

166342; 420 c647W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, how much has been spent by each local authority on (a) arm's length management organisations, (b) private finance initiative and (c) stock retention in relation to ownership of housing. - Inc figures and fact that a table showing figures for 2002-03, the capital spend...

Asked by

David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 November 2003

Reference

138681; 413 c1082W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what evaluation of the Pathfinders programme has taken place. - Inc ref to http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_housing/document s/page/odpm_house_609810.pdf.

Asked by

Jim Cunningham (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 November 2003

Reference

139675; 413 c1084-5W

House

House of Commons

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, whether local authorities which under the Communities Plan do not use the options of stock transfer, Arm's Length Management Organisations or PFI, may receive increased investment in their housing stock above that in the Housing Investment Programme.

Asked by

Clive Betts (Labour)

Answering body

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

17 July 2003

Reference

126164; 409 c580W

House

House of Commons

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher