Skip to main content

1-20 of 50 results for house:"House of Lords"

Answering member X
Lord Callanan
Subject X
Offshore industry

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Callanan, Lord (50)
More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Offshore industry (50)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government who is responsible for undertaking and funding the decommissioning and removal of (1) offshore oil and gas platforms and connections, and (2) offshore wind turbines and connections.

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
HL4203
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what assessment they have made of recent reports that global heating is likely to pass the 1.5-degree Celsius threshold this year, and how they intend to cooperate with international partners to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Lead member
Baroness Sheehan
Answering member
Lord Callanan
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
18 January 2024
Reference
835 cc521-535
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government how much of the Carbon Capture and Storage Infrastructure Fund they have awarded in contracts to companies involved in the oil and gas industry.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 cc5-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, no contracts have yet been awarded through the cluster sequencing process. The amount that may be awarded to individual projects is still

subject to negotiations. Project sponsors are from a range of industries including cement, industrial gases, energy from waste, et cetera. In addition, up to £40 million of the CIF is being spent under the UKRI industrial decarbonisation challenge fund, which aims to deliver significant reductions in industrial carbon dioxide emissions.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 c5
House
House of Lords

No, I will not give the noble Baroness that assurance, for a number of good reasons. First, in the real world, as opposed to in the noble Baroness’s fantasy green world, CCUS is an essential technology.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 c6
House
House of Lords

The Climate Change Committee has said that CCUS is essential and not an option if we are to meet our net-zero goal, which we wish to do. Secondly, in a number of industries—cement and energy from waste, et cetera—CCUS is the only option to decarbonise those industries. Unless the noble Baroness is saying that she wants them all to close down, so that we have no building in this country and import all our cement from overseas, what is her practical solution in the real world to delivering these technologies?

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 c6
House
House of Lords

It is not one or the other; we need to do both. Of course we need to push ahead with renewables, and I have set out many times in this House how well we are doing. Almost 60% of electricity in the last quarter was delivered by renewables, but CCUS is also essential. We have committed £20 billion-worth of funding to CCUS over the next few years because everybody thinks it essential to meeting our goals. It also offers a massive export opportunity for this country, as we have expertise in many of these technologies. The estimate is that capturing 20 million to 30 million tonnes of CO2 by 2030 could deliver up to 50,000 jobs, many of them in our industrial heartlands.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 c6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this makes me think that we cannot win on this. One part of the Opposition does not want to award these contracts at all and the Labour Party thinks we should have done it earlier. The reality is that we are proceeding with negotiations. It is our aim to have the contracts let for the first 10 projects by quarter 3 of next year. This is a really exciting technology, but we need to do the negotiations properly and get maximum value for money for the taxpayer from what is an emerging new industry.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 c7
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is dogged in his pursuit of this, and I have answered his question before. As he knows, under the last contracts for difference round, a number of tidal projects were successful in receiving funding.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
833 c7
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of oil and gas extracted from UK territorial waters was exported in (1) 2019, (2) 2020, (3) 2021, and (4) 2022.

Asked by
Baroness Boycott (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2023
Reference
HL8714
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of existing oil and gas fields within the UK’s territorial waters is owned by companies headquartered in the UK.

Asked by
Baroness Boycott (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2023
Reference
HL8712
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of oil and gas extracted from UK territorial waters was extracted by companies headquartered in the UK in (1) 2019, (2) 2020, (3) 2021, and (4) 2022.

Asked by
Baroness Boycott (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2023
Reference
HL8713
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the compatibility of the licensing of new offshore oil and gas with their commitments under (1) the Paris Climate Agreement, and (2) the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2023
Reference
HL7948
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to mitigate the impact of the decline in the size of the North Sea oil sector on the UK economy.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2023
Reference
HL6546
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have held any discussions with BP following reports that the company will fail to meet its climate targets; and what steps they are taking to promote sustainability in oil companies.

Asked by
Bishop of St Albans (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 2023
Reference
HL5623
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment has been made of the suitability of the use of Modular Offshore grids in the North Sea corridor to transport power closer to demand; and what assessment they have made of the implementation of Belgium’s offshore grid in this regard.

Asked by
Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 February 2023
Reference
HL5065
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to remove barriers experienced by offshore oil and gas workers when seeking to transition to green jobs in the offshore energy sector.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 January 2023
Reference
HL4425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Great Britain has 1.5 billion cubic metres of gas storage capacity, which equates to approximately five days of peak January demand. Energy security is an absolute priority for the Government, and therefore we welcome Centrica taking the necessary steps to reopen the Rough storage facility this winter, which is its commercial decision. Last week, the North Sea Transition Authority granted its approval to Centrica to open Rough. Centrica has also received approvals from the Health and Safety Executive and Ofgem.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c192
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has made a number of points that deserve an answer. First, it was a commercial decision for Centrica to close the Rough storage facility. Secondly, the reason that the UK has traditionally had lower levels of underground storage than the likes of Italy or Germany is precisely because 45% of our own capacity is from our own domestic resources, which is essentially a huge gas storage facility. We also have 20% of all the LNG unloading facilities in Europe, and in fact the UK has been taking the opportunity during the summer to help the EU, including Germany and other countries, to refill their storage capacities using our LNG import facilities, because they did not have enough of them. So it is a complicated picture, but energy security is a great priority for us, and we are well placed for it.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c192
House
House of Lords

As I intimated in my previous answer, we are co-operating closely with the European Union, and as I said, throughout the summer, in the quiet months, the UK’s LNG terminals—we have 20% of the entire European capacity—have been working overtime precisely to help our European friends to refill their storage capacity in time for the winter months. Therefore, security is a top priority for us, and of course we work very closely with other suppliers such as Norway, with LNG suppliers, and with our European friends.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2022
Reference
824 c193
House
House of Lords