Skip to main content

1-20 of 41 results for house:"House of Lords"

Answering member X
Lord Callanan
Subject X
Licensing

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

More
Callanan, Lord (41)

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Licensing (41)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington
Answering member
Lord Callanan
Department
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
15 June 2026
Reference
857 cc1-9GC
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps, if any, they are taking to (1) implement a national framework for the licensing of land for geothermal drilling, and (2) streamline permissions to enable geothermal drilling to take place.

Asked by
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2023
Reference
HL275
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what is the expected grade of the oil reserves in licensed but undeveloped fields in the North Sea basin; and what estimate they have made of the likelihood of the oil from these fields being used domestically in the UK as opposed to being exported.

Asked by
Baroness Boycott (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2023
Reference
HL8715
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to speed up the provision of connections to the electrical grid and the issuing of permits for renewable energy developments.

Asked by
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 June 2023
Reference
HL8102
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the compatibility of the licensing of new offshore oil and gas with their commitments under (1) the Paris Climate Agreement, and (2) the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 June 2023
Reference
HL7948
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government work closely with the Climate Change Committee and are grateful for its expert independent advice. The committee provided advice on 24 February 2022 in relation to both new licensing and the climate compatibility checkpoint; the advice was published on the committee’s website. Officials also had several discussions with the committee throughout the design process for the checkpoint. Its advice was considered in the final design, which has now been published on the GOV.UK website.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1274
House
House of Lords

I do not agree with the noble Baroness. She is dead wrong about these matters. The reality is, whether the Liberal Democrats like it or not, that we get about 75% of our energy from oil and gas. That is declining, and the North Sea is a declining field. Unless she is proposing to tell voters that they should disconnect their gas boilers or not drive their cars anywhere, we have a requirement for oil and gas in the future, albeit for a declining amount. Therefore, the only question is whether we get them from our own fields and employ British workers, paying British taxes, or whether we import them from abroad, which usually has a higher carbon footprint. That is the choice that faces us.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1275
House
House of Lords

Let me give my noble friend some other quotes from the letter from the Climate Change Committee, with which he is of course closely associated:

“UK extraction has a relatively low carbon footprint (more clearly for gas than for oil) and the UK will continue to be a net importer of fossil fuels for the foreseeable future, implying there may be emissions advantages to UK production replacing imports”.

I think he should read the letter that he sent.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1275
House
House of Lords

As the noble Baroness is aware, we have a plan to reduce our flaring. We had a Question on that a few weeks ago. We have committed, along with many other countries, to eliminate flaring by 2030. The amount of flaring is declining rapidly across the North Sea and action is being taken.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1275
House
House of Lords

I refer the noble Baroness to the answer I gave to the noble Baroness, Lady Sheehan. We still have in this country a requirement for oil and gas. Some 80% of our space heating comes from gas. We need to phase that out in a transition. Over the years, we need to electrify more, but in the short term we have a requirement for oil and gas. The question is whether we want to get it from Qatar or Saudi Arabia and pay taxes abroad, or employ our own people in the North Sea to extract those same reserves?

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1276
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to disappoint the noble Baroness but the Minister is going to say that we do not subsidise fossil fuels, because that is the case. In fact, the opposite is true. We gain billions of pounds per year in tax revenues from fossil fuels.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1276
House
House of Lords

I actually agree with him on that particular statement. Of course we need to move towards phasing out fossil fuel use; nobody disagrees with that. We have a legal commitment to do that and we are doing so through a transition. As I said in response to previous questions, the question is where we get those reserves from in future. Even with new licensing, UK production in the North Sea will continue to decline at a rate of about 7% per year. At the moment we are importing LNG to satisfy our domestic demand, which has about twice the carbon footprint of that produced in the North Sea. I really do not understand the point the noble Baroness is making.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1276
House
House of Lords

Decarbonising our electricity system, which we are doing at the fastest rate of all G7 countries, will require much more electrification. Renewable generation capacity is currently six times greater than in 2010. We are expanding to deliver up to 50 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2030. We have said that we will also consider onshore wind in future CfD rounds. We have one of the highest solar capacities in Europe as well—in fact, we have more solar capacity than even countries such as France.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1277
House
House of Lords

The reason I said it was lower carbon intensity is that that is a fact. There are lots of studies being done on it. Imported LNG has about twice the carbon footprint of domestic production. Of course I cannot give him a guarantee that it will all be consumed within the UK, because it is an international market. We have pipelines, for instance, interlinking our gas supply with the continent, as the noble Lord well knows. If the Liberal Democrats really believe that we should stop our production tomorrow, I look forward to all the focus leaflets—which are being distributed at the moment—telling people that they have to stop using their gas boilers or driving their cars. Lots of leaflets are being produced but I have not noticed the Liberals saying that in public.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1277
House
House of Lords

Of course it has an impact on biodiversity, but we have very strict climate and environmental studies that need to be done before any fields are licensed. This is the subject of court action at the moment, as the noble Baroness probably realises, so I cannot comment on it in detail. We follow all the required biodiversity protocols.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 c1277
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the Climate Change Committee about (1) the impact newly licensed oil and gas infrastructure will have on domestic and global emissions, and (2) the design of their ‘Climate Compatibility Checkpoint’.

Asked by
Baroness Sheehan (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2023
Reference
829 cc1274-7
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what plans they have to increase the number of renewable energy generation licences.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2022
Reference
826 cc539-542
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the acceleration in renewable deployment will be supported by the UK’s main renewable energy scheme, contracts for difference. The latest round delivered almost 11 gigawatts of new renewable projects, almost double that achieved in the previous round. The next CfD round will be brought forward to March 2023, and future rounds will run annually to further drive deployment of renewable power. The majority of CfD applicants are exempt from the requirement to hold a generation licence.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2022
Reference
826 c539
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for that, which is totally unrelated to the Question she tabled. There have been almost 1,000 generation licences

issued. It is a demand-driven process. All generators below 50 megawatts are exempt from having a licence in the first place.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2022
Reference
826 c539
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes an important point. I suspect that he knows the answer to his own question: because it has been relatively still, there have been relatively small amounts of wind in the power sector, so the other sources of power—nuclear, imports, gas, et cetera—have moved in to fill the gap. That is how a diverse system should work.

Answered by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2022
Reference
826 c540
House
House of Lords