1-7 of 7 results for subject:Liability
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.139 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Liability
- We searched for
- subject_t:Liability OR subject_t:"Duty of care" OR subject_ses:91832
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
Whether they intend to make any contribution to the costs incurred by the parties in the case of Barker (Respondent) v Corus (UK) plc (Appellants) (formerly Barker (Respondent) v Saint Gobain Pipelines plc (Appellants)), following the retrospective reversal by the Compensation Act 2006 of the decision of the House of...
Whether they intend to make any contribution to the costs incurred by the parties in the case of Barker (Respondent) v Corus (UK) plc (Appellants) (formerly Barker (Respondent) v Saint Gobain Pipelines plc (Appellants)), following the retrospective reversal by the Compensation Act 2006 of the decision of the House of...
Which 10 barristers have received the highest legal aid fees for product liability work involving a medicinal product or medical device in the last year; and, in each case, what was (a) the amount received; (b) the number of cases taken; (c) the number of cases taken which proceeded beyond...
Which 10 barristers have received the highest legal aid fees for product liability work involving a medicinal product or medical device in the last year; and, in each case, what was (a) the amount received; (b) the number of cases taken; (c) the number of cases taken which proceeded beyond...
Which 10 firms of solicitors have received the highest legal aid fees for product liability work involving a medicinal product or medical device in the last year; and, in each case, what was (a) the amount received; (b) the number of cases taken; (c) the number of cases taken which proceeded...
Which 10 firms of solicitors have received the highest legal aid fees for product liability work involving a medicinal product or medical device in the last year; and, in each case, what was (a) the amount received; (b) the number of cases taken; (c) the number of cases taken which proceeded...
What legally aided multi-party product liability actions, whether in negligence or in strict liability, there have been since 1990 in respect of a pharmaceutical product or medical device, indicating (a) the number of legal aid certificates issued; (b) the number of individual cases in which legal proceedings were issued; (c)...
What legally aided multi-party product liability actions, whether in negligence or in strict liability, there have been since 1990 in respect of a pharmaceutical product or medical device, indicating (a) the number of legal aid certificates issued; (b) the number of individual cases in which legal proceedings were issued; (c)...
How many legally aided liability cases involving a medicinal product or medical device were closed in the last year, indicating how many cases (a) proceeded beyond investigation; and (b) resulted in an award of damages or a settlement involving an agreement to pay damages.
How many legally aided liability cases involving a medicinal product or medical device were closed in the last year, indicating how many cases (a) proceeded beyond investigation; and (b) resulted in an award of damages or a settlement involving an agreement to pay damages.
Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Ashton of Upholland on 25 March 2002 633 c26WA, which stated that the financial liabilities of school companies which failed would not rest with governors or the head teacher, who will settle any outstanding liabilities. [HL 3830].
Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Ashton of Upholland on 25 March 2002 633 c26WA, which stated that the financial liabilities of school companies which failed would not rest with governors or the head teacher, who will settle any outstanding liabilities. [HL 3830].
What would be the liability of governors, head teachers and other partners if a company, set up under Chapter Three of the Education Bill, were to fail; and who would be responsible for assessing risk [HL 3318].
What would be the liability of governors, head teachers and other partners if a company, set up under Chapter Three of the Education Bill, were to fail; and who would be responsible for assessing risk [HL 3318].