Ministerial statement on Thursday, 12 February 2026, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent.

Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address Motion

Urgent question on the Government's response to the Humble Address agreed by the House of Commons on 4 February 2026, including on progress made, timescales for compliance and the Government's approach to any material it proposes to withhold or delay.

Secondary information

Type: Parliamentary proceeding
Reference: 853 cc363-7
Session: 2024-26
Department: Cabinet Office
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Related items: Lord Mandelson
Wednesday, 4 February 2026
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Commons; Standards in Public Life
Tuesday, 10 February 2026
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords; Update on the Government response to the Humble Address motion
Thursday, 12 February 2026
Written statements
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 cc363-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, with the leave of the House, I shall now repeat in the form of a Statement the Answer g...; Baroness Williams of Trafford | 853 c364 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thank the Minister for repeating the Statement. Events have moved on somewhat since t...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 c364 (Link to this contribution)
I thank the noble Baroness. She knows more than I do, outside of media speculation, about the app...; Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 853 c365 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, we on these Benches welcome the degree of transparency that is happening over the Mande...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 c365 (Link to this contribution)
The noble Lord is absolutely right. One of the things I find so distressing about the events of r...; Baroness Coffey | 853 c365 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, as the Minister knows, Sir Lindsay Hoyle said that the ISC is completely separate and i...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 cc365-6 (Link to this contribution)
Time is indeed ticking, but the noble Baroness will be aware we still have two more debates in fr...; Lord West of Spithead | 853 c366 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, as a member of the ISC, I note that my noble friend the Minister did not say anything a...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 c366 (Link to this contribution)
I thank my noble friend—the idea he could be bolshie would be completely beyond my appreciation o...; Baroness Coffey | 853 c366 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, can the Minister confirm that the National Security Adviser, who is not a civil servant...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 c366 (Link to this contribution)
I have been very clear on who participated in the meeting on Tuesday. On the role of the National...; Baroness Stowell of Beeston | 853 c367 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the Minister referred to new legislation to remove peerages from disgraced Peers. When ...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 c367 (Link to this contribution)
I thank the noble Baroness. She is absolutely right. The reality is that we need to make sure tha...; Lord Jackson of Peterborough | 853 c367 (Link to this contribution)
Will the Minister confirm that legislation to do with bringing the House into disrepute will not ...; Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent | 853 c367 (Link to this contribution)
I absolutely will. The noble Lord and I may not always agree on certain issues; I do not believe ...
Subjects: Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Diplomatic service Intelligence and Security Committee National security Public appointments Mandelson, Lord USA Epstein, Jeffrey
Link: View this Parliamentary proceeding on hansard.parliament.uk

Lord Mandelson: Government Response to Humble Address Motion

Secondary information

Librarians' tools