Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 November 2018. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.


Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill

My Lords, as the Minister said on the previous amendment, these amendments have to be read with that one. NSDs and their oversight are to some extent part and parcel of the same debate. As my noble friend said, it is perhaps a debate about convenience or inconvenience. It would probably be naive of me not to accept that there is an issue of resources here, but balancing how resources are applied and human rights does not always produce immediately obvious answers. This may be a matter of fine detail or where we place the line—that, too, can be a challenge.

Thinking of challenges and listening to what the Minister had to say about the period not necessarily being two years, I wonder how an individual would challenge the period applied and how many times over recent years NSDs have been of less than two years. That may be something that the Minister is able to tell me after today’s debate. For now, looking at these two groups of amendments together, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c1714 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Counter-terrorism Borders Terrorism Security
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000
Counter-terrorism and Border Security Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk