Proceeding contribution from Lord Woolf (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 May 2018. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Civil Liability Bill [HL].
Civil Liability Bill [HL]
There is an answer to the problem that the noble and learned Lord raises. It might have implications for the workload of the judiciary but I think that could be handled. We should get away from the idea that a judge should assess damages in appropriate cases only at one stage. There is no reason why you cannot have a system where the matter can be restored to a judge in a case of differences of opinion to take into account succeeding circumstances. If the power existed, the courts would find that in the majority of cases, litigants—properly advised, as they are in these big cases—would come back only when there was a real difficulty between the insurer in practice and the claimant. In that way, matters could be reviewed to reflect any differing circumstances. It was not a one-off assessment that I was advocating but the ability to change the assessment. That would apply to PPOs as it would to any other laws.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 791 c619
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Damages Liability Investment Discounts Personal injury Lump sum payments Lord Chancellor
- Legislation
- Civil Liability Bill (HL) 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2018-06-12 15:30:49 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-15/18051558000195
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-15/18051558000195
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-05-15/18051558000195