Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Alicia Kearns (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 4 February 2026. It occurred during Opposition day on Lord Mandelson.


Lord Mandelson

I entirely agree with my very good and hon. Friend. I was taken aback by the comments of the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, the right hon. Member for Islington South and Finsbury (Emily Thornberry), who sought to give us a lecture on how Government vetting is undertaken. She kept referring to fast-stream civil servants as those responsible for vetting. Fast stream is a mode of recruitment, not a type of civil servant. It felt as if she was trying to suggest that junior civil servants should take the can for the vetting process that was pursued. I very much hope that is not the case, because it is deeply inappropriate.

The commonality between the appointments of Lord Mandelson and Jonathan Powell is Morgan McSweeney, so I must ask whether Morgan McSweeney is the one who should be held accountable. At this point, it looks as if no one will be held accountable.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
780 cc358-9 
Session
2024-26
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Diplomatic service Correspondence Conflict of interests Intelligence and Security Committee Misconduct Prime Minister Public appointments Parliamentary scrutiny Offences against children Mandelson, Lord Vetting USA Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Global Counsel Epstein, Jeffrey
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk