Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Theresa Villiers (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 June 2023. It occurred during e-petition debate on Road User Charging Schemes.


Road User Charging Schemes

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Stringer.

I start by thanking my hon. Friend the Member for Don Valley (Nick Fletcher) for his very able introduction of this very important subject. I also thank everyone who has taken the trouble to sign the petitions that we are reflecting on today.

I will focus on the proposed extension of the ultra low emission zone to cover all London boroughs, including the whole of my Chipping Barnet constituency. I do not believe that this extension is either justified or acceptable. Although I can see that there is potentially a place for charging regimes in appropriate circumstances, ULEZ expansion is the wrong scheme at the wrong time.

Of course everyone in Westminster Hall today will agree that we need to reduce air pollution, and a range of Government policies are delivering progress towards that important goal. The Mayor of London published

an independent impact assessment of his ULEZ expansion proposal that concluded that it would have only a negligible impact on air quality. I emphasise that—only a negligible impact. Yet I am sure that many of us have had constituents attending our surgeries to explain the financial hardship that they will experience as a result of this charge being introduced at a time of major increases in the cost of living.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 cc4-5WH 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Costs Air pollution Greater London Powers Mayor of London Roads Tolls Low emission zones
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk