Proceeding contribution from Martin Vickers (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 October 2019. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Exiting the European Union (Environmental Protection).
Exiting the European Union (Environmental Protection)
Following the ruling of the Supreme Court, Parliament returned early from Prorogation, and we have spent a fortnight now in effect going through action replays of what has already taken place.
Has any assessment been made of the cost to the taxpayer of Parliament being here and serving no useful purpose?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 664 c1742
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conservation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species Environment protection EU law Furs Pollution control Trade Wildlife Timber Non-native species Brexit
- Legislation
- Environment and Wildlife (Legislative Functions) (EU Exit) (Amendment) Regulations 2019
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2019-10-10 13:04:07 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-10-08/19100894000029
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-10-08/19100894000029
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-10-08/19100894000029