Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 1 February 2016. It occurred during Backbench debate on Financial Conduct Authority.


Financial Conduct Authority

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that intervention, because I think there is a difficulty with time. Reference has been made to the HBOS report, which took a long time to come forward. Again, it started under the FSA, and the failures were of the FSA, not of the FCA. For a body that has been going for only three years, such a timespan is perhaps not that unreasonable, given that for two of those years it was making a specific investigation.

We have made huge progress, thanks to my hon. Friend the Member for Aberconwy, in achieving redress of grievance. That is enormously important, and it is right to do that. However, a vote of no confidence is the nuclear weapon of Parliament. It is something that brings Governments down. If we pass the motion, it ought to lead to fundamental change at the FCA and resignations, but I fear that we are trying to fire this gun

before we have loaded it with gunpowder, and that therefore it will misfire. In that respect, I hope that my hon. Friend will withdraw the motion, because I think it has had its effect through the debate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
605 cc735-6 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Consumers Financial markets Regulation Financial Conduct Authority Interest rate hedging products
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk