Proceeding contribution from Austin Mitchell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 March 2012. It occurred during Backbench debate on Common Fisheries Policy.
Common Fisheries Policy
I agree with the hon. Gentleman—that is what we have to do and what we could operate regionally if we got the powers to do so. That is the way that we have to go, but if co-decision making is handed to the European Parliament, politics will be involved again. I can imagine the Spanish MEPs will fight vigorously for their industry in a way that the English MEPs are not conditioned to do. I imagine, too, that the conservationists will have a much louder voice than the fishermen, because there are no fishermen in the European Parliament but there are lots of conservationists. Although some of my best friends are conservationists, their interests are not necessarily those of the commercial fishing industry. Conservationists are also over-alarmist about stocks, and on the basis of panic about stocks, they propose measures that will never work. It is vital that we separate policy and implementation. Implementation should go down to the RACs and policy stay in Brussels.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 542 c444-5
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Common fisheries policy Conservation Fisheries Fishing catches Fishing vessels EU action Reform Quotas
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:28:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818122
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818122
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818122