Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 1 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 124FC. These amendments concern the role of local authorities in our vision to improve access to the English coast. Noble Lords will appreciate the extensive debate that we had about these issues in Committee; we tabled these two amendments following the discussions about the importance of involving local authorities in developing the proposals for coastal access in their areas that will be contained in Natural England’s report. As my noble friend Lord Hunt said during those discussions, the Government’s intention has always been to involve local authorities, which we see as extremely important partners in the coastal access project. Where they are willing to act, they will be fully involved in the implementation of the proposals and establishment of the route itself. Amendment 124FA requires Natural England to set out in its scheme, and any revised scheme, under Clause 288 the approach that it will take when deciding whether it would be appropriate for an access authority to carry out any preliminary activity. Amendment 124FC inserts into Clause 292 a definition of "preliminary activity", which is any activity that Natural England considers will facilitate the preparation of a report under Section 51 of the 1949 Act pursuant to the coastal access duty. The sort of activities that we have in mind are advising Natural England on the best line for the route, potential alternative routes and any necessary infrastructure and identifying those with a relevant interest who will potentially be affected by the proposals. The amendment requires Natural England to consider whether it would be appropriate for the access authority, which is defined in the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 as the local highway authority or the national park authority in a national park, to carry out any preliminary activity and, if so, to take all reasonable steps to enter into an agreement with the access authority. It also gives access authorities powers to enter into such agreements in relation to their area. These amendments formalise the approach that the Government intend should be taken and that Natural England has indicated in its scheme that it will take it. I believe that they will provide the assurances that noble Lords have sought in previous debates. They will ensure that local authorities, where they are willing to act, can have a key role in the implementation of the coastal access duty. I know that that has been of considerable concern to noble Lords opposite and therefore it is with some confidence that I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c32-3 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Birds Coastal areas Devolution Crown dependencies British overseas territories Cycling Coastal erosion Land Leisure Gun sports Environment protection Exemptions Horse riding Isle of Man Gibraltar Internet International law Estuaries Local government Ownership Parking Planning permission Planning Ports Privacy Public transport Maps Public footpaths Nature conservation Parish and town councils National parks Public inquiries Safety Rights of way Seas and oceans Wildlife Planning Inspectorate Jersey Guernsey Natural England
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk