Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Business Rate Supplements Bill.
Business Rate Supplements Bill
I am grateful to the noble Baroness. I thought that I understood London, but I am puzzled why Clause 3(5) is necessary. Is it because the GLA’s powers—as distinct from those of the functional bodies—are not sufficiently extensive?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c323GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Business Housing Greater London Discounts Economic growth Local government Local government finance Public consultation Business rates Regional planning and development Business improvement districts
- Legislation
- Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-06 17:20:20 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555611
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555611
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_555611