Proceeding contribution from Lord Redwood (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
Most pensioners do not think that a load more administrators and a very expensive computerisation programme represents an increase in their welfare. To return to the comparison, the Conservative Government did not expect pensioners to live on the sums to which the hon. Gentleman referred. We assumed that they would either have a good private pension top-up, because we did not tax it and wreck it, or that they would receive means-tested benefits, as is the case under this Government. The big change that we made was to link the standard pension to prices, not earnings, which obviously made an impact. This Government have done exactly the same for the past 10 years, and will continue to do so for the next five years, if they stay in power.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c694
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime Agriculture Aviation Business Corporation tax Climate change Buildings Bureaucracy Capital allowances Fraud Housing Education Environment Investment Income tax Energy Electricity generation Economic situation Floods Inflation Pensions Olympic Games Passengers Petrol Partnerships Pension funds Small businesses Regional planning and development Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Rural areas Off-payroll working
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:08:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391259
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391259
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391259