Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his explanation of the Government’s attitude to these issues. I think that a good dinner must have been available around the House, because there seems to have been a lively debate on this subject from all those who have participated, and I thank them. I would quarrel slightly with the Minister about the idea that we were in any way bearing down on the tourist industry. As far as I know, the tourist industry is one of the great planks that those who live in rural areas use to maintain their way of life. I am not sure which bit of the tourist industry does not live in rural areas—perhaps bus tours. At the same time, it has been useful to sharpen our minds a little about the different roles of the two commissions, or whatever we like to call them, being set up under this Bill. We are grateful to the Minister for explaining his attitude to the amendments that we have tabled. In light of what he said, however, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 104 to 109 not moved.] Clause 25 [Directions]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1322 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Birds Conservation Climate change Countryside Biodiversity Finance Environment protection Functions Imports National Lottery Public bodies Non-departmental public bodies Sustainable development Wildlife Rural areas Regional development agencies Rural Development Service Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk