Written question asked by Nigel Waterson (Conservative) on Thursday, 17 October 2002, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 29 October 2002. It was answered by John Healey (Labour) on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 on behalf of the Treasury.
Treasury
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what action she proposes to take in the light of the House of Lords decision in Customs and Excise v. Plantiflor Ltd. - Includes ref to Customs and Excise issued business brief (no 23/2002) available in Library (Dep 02/177) and at: www.nds.coi.gov.uk.
- Answer
-
Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what action he proposes to take in the light of the House of Lords decision Customs and Excise v. Plantiflor Ltd. [76299] John Healey: I have been asked to reply. The judgment of the House of Lords confirms the view of Customs and Excise that Plantiflor should account for VAT on delivery charges as part of the total price of the goods it supplies. On 20 August 2002 Customs and Excise issued business brief (number 23/ 2002) which gives full background details on the issue and provides guidance on action to be taken by all affected businesses. It is available in the Library of the House and can also be accessed from the Central Office of Information website at: www.nds.coi.gov.uk.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 76299; 391 c777-8W;391 c773W
- Session
- 2001-02
- Subjects
- Customs and Excise Delivery services Liability Taxation VAT
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2016-10-07 15:29:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_722779
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_722779
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_722779