Skip to main content

Written question asked by Kevin McNamara (Labour) on Monday, 23 October 2000, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 6 November 2000. It was answered by Charles Clarke (Labour) on Monday, 6 November 2000 on behalf of the Home Office.


Home Office

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what guidance is available for chief police officers in standardising procedures for assessing fingerprint evidence; how frequently have standards been changed since a standardised system was first introduced; and what standards are used by police forces of (a) other European Union member states and (b) the United States. - Inc figure and ref to report published in Fingerprint World and the Journal of Fingerprint Identification in Library.
Answer

Mr. McNamara: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what guidance is available for chief police officers in standardising procedures for assessing fingerprint evidence; how frequently have standards been changed since a standardised system was first introduced; and what standards are used by police forces of (a) other European Union member states and (b) the United States. [134881] Mr. Charles Clarke: The current requirement for presenting fingerprint evidence in court is based on at least 16 points of comparison. This dates from 1935. In 1988 the Home Office commissioned a review of this requirement. A report was published in Fingerprint World and the Journal of Fingerprint Identification and was placed in the Library. In 1994 the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) initiated a review which concluded that fingerprint evidence should in future be based upon the expert testimony of fingerprint officers rather than any particular fixed number of points of comparison. ACPO are planning to introduce a non-numerical standard in the new year, once they are satisfied that the appropriate quality assurance standards, inspection, training and competency testing regimes that will underpin the new standard are in place within force fingerprint bureaux. There is no single common standard in Europe. Norway has a non-numerical standard while others have numerical standards varying between eight and 16 characteristics. Europol are considering moving to a non-numerical standard. The United States uses a non-numerical fingerprint standard.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
134881; 356 c109W
Session
1999-00
Subjects
Fingerprints Evidence Identification of criminals
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk